Provision record
Starbucks · Starbucks Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Rejection of changes still requires arbitration under prior version

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Starbucks and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Starbucks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

If we are unable to resolve the Dispute, either of us may commence arbitration with National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM") under its Comprehensive Dispute Resolution Rules and Procedures...

Credit Karma

If you commence arbitration in accordance with the Agreement, Credit Karma will reimburse you for your payment of the filing fee, unless your claim is for more than $10,000

Target

If we make any future changes to this arbitration agreement (other than a change to our contact information), you may reject any such change by sending your personally signed, written notice to the following address within 30 days of the change: Target Law Department...with a clear statement that yo...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
By rejecting any future change, you are agreeing that you will arbitrate any Dispute between you and Starbucks in accordance with this version of the arbitration agreement.

Excerpt from Starbucks's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Starbucks Terms of Use
Entity
Starbucks
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006094, captured Aug. 26, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-055027
Document ID
CA-D-000624
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006094)
2262609d121205a03a83ded8d4c262ff46b227a3399d45cf3a6b95fb101c4970
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 01:23 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006094, captured Aug. 26, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007623, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Starbucks
Document: Starbucks Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-055027
Version: CA-V-006094
Captured: 2026-08-26 01:07:05 UTC
SHA-256: 2262609d121205a0…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/starbucks/starbucks-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-055027/rejection-of-changes-still-requires-arbitration-under-prior-version/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Starbucks's Rejection of changes still requires arbitration under prior version clause do?

The clause states: “By rejecting any future change, you are agreeing that you will arbitrate any Dispute between you and Starbucks in accordance with this version of the arbitration agreement.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Starbucks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks.