Provision record
Starbucks · Starbucks Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Court may enforce multiple case filing procedures

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Starbucks and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Starbucks's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

The parties agree to sever and litigate in court any request for public injunctive relief after completing arbitration for the underlying claim and all other claims.

Credit Karma

you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated

Anyscale

The award of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
A court of competent jurisdiction shall have the authority to enforce the Additional Procedures for Multiple Case Filings, including the power to enjoin the filing or prosecution of arbitrations...

Excerpt from Starbucks's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Starbucks Terms of Use
Entity
Starbucks
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006094, captured Aug. 26, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-055025
Document ID
CA-D-000624
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006094)
2262609d121205a03a83ded8d4c262ff46b227a3399d45cf3a6b95fb101c4970
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 01:23 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006094, captured Aug. 26, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007623, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Starbucks
Document: Starbucks Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-055025
Version: CA-V-006094
Captured: 2026-08-26 01:07:05 UTC
SHA-256: 2262609d121205a0…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/starbucks/starbucks-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-055025/court-may-enforce-multiple-case-filing-procedures/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Starbucks's Court may enforce multiple case filing procedures clause do?

The clause states: “A court of competent jurisdiction shall have the authority to enforce the Additional Procedures for Multiple Case Filings, including the power to enjoin the filing or prosecution of arbitrations...”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Starbucks?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks.