Provision record
Stability AI · Stability AI Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Public Injunctive Relief Severed and Litigated in Court

Medium severity Explicit document language Common · 200 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Stability AI and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Spotify Medium

If any aspect of this "Pre-arbitration notice of dispute and informal resolution period" section has not been met, the parties agree that a court can enjoin the filing or prosecution of an arbitration...

Anyscale Medium

The award of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.

OpenAI Medium

All issues are for the arbitrator to decide, except a California court has the authority to determine: (a) if a provision of this arbitration section should be severed and the consequences of that severance

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
We both agree to sever any request for public injunctive relief and litigate that issue in court after finishing arbitration for the remaining claims.

Excerpt from Stability AI's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stability AI Terms of Use
Entity
Stability AI
Date stated by the document
July 31, 2025
As printed in Stability AI’s text (version CA-V-006269), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006269, captured Sept. 1, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-078490
Document ID
CA-D-000513
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006269)
1c8baf12c81e02eefeb52fcf7287bb05bd41e70aced7074966361c351337e5f4
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 09:21 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found verbatim in version CA-V-006269 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Stability AI
Document: Stability AI Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-078490
Version: CA-V-006269
Captured: 2026-09-01 00:50:49 UTC
SHA-256: 1c8baf12c81e02ee…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stability-ai/stability-ai-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-078490/public-injunctive-relief-severed-and-litigated-in-court/
Accessed: Oct. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stability AI's Public Injunctive Relief Severed and Litigated in Court clause do?

The clause states: “We both agree to sever any request for public injunctive relief and litigate that issue in court after finishing arbitration for the remaining claims.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 200 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stability AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.