Provision record
Stability AI · Stability AI Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Arbitrator Bound by Terms as Court Would Be

Medium severity Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 211 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Stability AI changes these terms. Follow Stability AI →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Stability AI Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Stability AI →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Chegg Medium

The arbitrator's awarding of damages must be consistent with the terms of the "Limitation of Liability" section of these Terms of Use as to the types and the amounts of damages for which a party may be held liable.

Wise Medium

Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...

Writer Medium

The parties agree to sever and litigate in court any request for public injunctive relief after completing arbitration for the underlying claim and all other claims.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Stability AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Stability AI → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The arbitrator must also follow the provisions of these Terms as a court would.

Excerpt from Stability AI's Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stability AI Terms of Use
Entity
Stability AI
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-048903
Document ID
CA-D-00513
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
16c6dfe964855b08ac9679c7ce703ee07d6ee1312917e695d1b098ccf1c9b5a0
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 09:21 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stability AI
Document: Stability AI Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-048903
Captured: 2026-05-08 09:21:53 UTC
SHA-256: 16c6dfe964855b08…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stability-ai/stability-ai-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-048903/arbitrator-bound-by-terms-as-court-would-be/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stability AI's Arbitrator Bound by Terms as Court Would Be clause do?

The clause states: “The arbitrator must also follow the provisions of these Terms as a court would.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stability AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.