“misleading end users about the nature of outputs from Stability AI Technology (such as pretending it was made by a human) or failing to appropriately disclose when someone is interacting with AI...”
This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This prohibition targets deception at the point of end-user interaction, requiring transparency both about the nature of AI outputs and about the AI character of the interaction itself.
Users who deploy Stability AI technology must not mislead end users about whether outputs are AI-generated and must appropriately disclose when end users are interacting with AI.
How other platforms handle this
as such disclosure may be required by the order or requirement of a court, administrative agency or other governmental body, subject to the Receiving Party providing to the Disclosing Party reasonable written notice...
we may disclose Confidential Information and Company Data if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (i) comply with legal process, applicable laws or government requests...
formalizes a requirement that we provide the LTBT with regular briefings
"misleading end users about the nature of outputs from Stability AI Technology (such as pretending it was made by a human) or failing to appropriately disclose when someone is interacting with AI...Excerpt from Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This prohibition targets deception at the point of end-user interaction, requiring transparency both about the nature of AI outputs and about the AI character of the interaction itself.
Users who deploy Stability AI technology must not mislead end users about whether outputs are AI-generated and must appropriately disclose when end users are interacting with AI.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.