Provision record
Stability AI · Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Requirement for Professional Review of Essential Service Advice

High confidence Common · 267 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

What does Stability AI prohibit regarding advice on essential services?
“provision of advice on essential services, including in the medical or health field, without review by a qualified professional and disclosure of the use of AI assistance and its potential limitations.”
Version CA-V-006270, captured Sept. 1, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Stability AI prohibits the provision of advice on essential services, including in the medical or health field, without review by a qualified professional and disclosure of the use of AI assistance and its potential limitations.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Stability AI and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

This prohibition imposes two concurrent conditions—professional review and AI disclosure—on any essential-service advice, meaning the absence of either condition alone renders the advice prohibited.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Users who deploy Stability AI technology to provide advice on essential services, including in the medical or health field, must ensure that a qualified professional has reviewed the advice and that users are informed of AI involvement and its potential limitations.

How other platforms handle this

Anthropic

external review of our Risk Reports can involve multiple external reviewers reviewing different unredacted sections of the Risk Report, so long as all parts of the unredacted report are evaluated by at least one external reviewer

Anyscale

as such disclosure may be required by the order or requirement of a court, administrative agency or other governmental body, subject to the Receiving Party providing to the Disclosing Party reasonable written notice...

OpenAI

Written claims concerning copyright infringement must include the following information: A physical or electronic signature...A description of the copyrighted work...A description of where the allegedly infringing material is located...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
provision of advice on essential services, including in the medical or health field, without review by a qualified professional and disclosure of the use of AI assistance and its potential limitations.

Excerpt from Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Stability AI
Date stated by the document
Sept. 30, 2026
As printed in Stability AI’s text (version CA-V-006270), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006270, captured Sept. 1, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-065279
Document ID
CA-D-000772
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006270)
dfa8ef04fba5b51083ffcc1161de4efa1b861862d239b07258abcc1f096c1737
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 13:00 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006270, captured Sept. 1, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Stability AI
Document: Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-065279
Version: CA-V-006270
Captured: 2026-09-01 00:50:50 UTC
SHA-256: dfa8ef04fba5b510…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stability-ai/stability-ai-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-065279/requirement-for-professional-review-of-essential-service-advice/
Accessed: Nov. 3, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stability AI's Requirement for Professional Review of Essential Service Advice clause do?

This prohibition imposes two concurrent conditions—professional review and AI disclosure—on any essential-service advice, meaning the absence of either condition alone renders the advice prohibited.

How does this clause affect you?

Users who deploy Stability AI technology to provide advice on essential services, including in the medical or health field, must ensure that a qualified professional has reviewed the advice and that users are informed of AI involvement and its potential limitations.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stability AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.