This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
...and (b) provide any reasonable information that is relevant to systemic risks assessment and mitigation to Mistral AI to allow Mistral AI to comply with its own obligations under the Applicable AI Laws.
We otherwise do not engage in profiling or automated decision making as defined under the State Privacy Laws.
Opt-out of profiling/automated decision making. You can opt-out of automated processing or profiling performed on personal information to evaluate, analyze, or predict personal aspects...
"assessing or predicting the risk of a person committing a crime, based solely on profiling or personal traits.Excerpt from Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “assessing or predicting the risk of a person committing a crime, based solely on profiling or personal traits.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.