Provision record
Stability AI · Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

CSAM Mandatory Reporting Commitment

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Stability AI changes these terms. Follow Stability AI →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Stability AI Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Stability AI →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits all uses of Stability AI technology to generate or facilitate CSAM, minor exploitation, grooming, trafficking, sextortion, or suggestive depictions of minors, and the document states that Stability AI will report CSAM to the appropriate authorities.

This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The explicit reporting commitment establishes that Stability AI has disclosed an active enforcement posture toward CSAM detection and reporting, which is operationally relevant for any platform or developer using Stability AI technology in contexts where user-generated content is involved.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The agreement prohibits any use of Stability AI technology involving CSAM or minor exploitation in any form, and the document states that identified CSAM will be reported to appropriate authorities. This provision applies to all users regardless of deployment context.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle CSAM Mandatory Reporting Commitment and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Stability AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Stability AI → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
child sexual abuse material (CSAM), sexual exploitation, grooming, or trafficking of minors. exploiting or abusing minors, including sextortion or any impersonation or enticement of minors for exploitative purposes. pedophilic behavior, such as through suggestive depictions of minors. We will report CSAM to the appropriate authorities.

Excerpt from Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: CSAM reporting in the United States is governed by 18 U.S.C. Section 2258A, which requires electronic service providers to report apparent CSAM to NCMEC's CyberTipline. The policy's statement that Stability AI will report CSAM to 'appropriate authorities' is consistent with this federal obligation. The EU's CSAM regulation and the UK Online Safety Act also establish reporting requirements for platforms in those jurisdictions. The document does not specify which authorities or frameworks are referenced. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. Any operator deploying Stability AI technology in a consumer-facing or user-generated content context should treat this provision as establishing a reporting baseline that Stability AI will act upon. Operators should also evaluate their own independent CSAM detection and reporting obligations under applicable law. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: US operators are subject to federal CSAM reporting requirements. EU operators face obligations under applicable EU digital services regulation. UK operators face Online Safety Act obligations. The policy's reporting commitment applies globally but the specific reporting mechanisms and authorities will vary by jurisdiction. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Platform operators integrating Stability AI should confirm their own CSAM detection and reporting workflows are independent of and complementary to Stability AI's stated reporting posture. Reliance on Stability AI's reporting commitment does not substitute for an operator's own legal obligations. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should document CSAM detection and reporting procedures separately from any reliance on Stability AI's policy commitments. Legal teams should confirm that enterprise agreements with Stability AI address CSAM incident notification and cooperation obligations.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over consumer protection practices, and CSAM-related deceptive or unfair practices on platforms may engage FTC jurisdiction.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Stability AI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 11, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013766
Document ID
CA-D-00772
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
97243bfbcafaa8ec231cbf1c7f8c8ae3a12786517a8390a19011cdbe233bec46
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 13:00 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stability AI
Document: Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-013766
Captured: 2026-05-11 13:00:52 UTC
SHA-256: 97243bfbcafaa8ec…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stability-ai/stability-ai-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-013766/csam-mandatory-reporting-commitment/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stability AI's CSAM Mandatory Reporting Commitment clause do?

The explicit reporting commitment establishes that Stability AI has disclosed an active enforcement posture toward CSAM detection and reporting, which is operationally relevant for any platform or developer using Stability AI technology in contexts where user-generated content is involved.

How does this clause affect you?

The agreement prohibits any use of Stability AI technology involving CSAM or minor exploitation in any form, and the document states that identified CSAM will be reported to appropriate authorities. This provision applies to all users regardless of deployment context.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stability AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.