Provision record
Stability AI · Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

AI Disclosure and Non-Deception Requirement

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Stability AI and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits using Stability AI technology to mislead end users into believing AI-generated content was created by a human, and requires appropriate disclosure when a user is interacting with AI in contexts where this is not apparent.

This analysis describes what Stability AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision creates an affirmative disclosure obligation for operators deploying Stability AI outputs in user-facing contexts where AI involvement may not be self-evident, including chatbots, synthetic media, automated customer service, and content creation tools delivered without clear attribution.

Interpretive note: The phrase 'where it is not apparent' is not defined in the document, creating interpretive uncertainty about the threshold for required disclosure in specific product contexts.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
Jul 9, 2026
First Seen
Jul 9, 2026
Last Seen

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, operators using Stability AI technology in consumer-facing products are required to disclose AI involvement when it is not apparent to the end user, and are prohibited from representing AI-generated outputs as human-created. This requirement applies across all deployment contexts covered by the AUP.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI Disclosure and Non-Deception Requirement and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
misleading end users about the nature of outputs from Stability AI Technology (such as pretending it was made by a human) or failing to appropriately disclose when someone is interacting with AI where it is not apparent.

Excerpt from Stability AI's Acceptable Use Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the EU AI Act's requirements for transparency in AI systems interacting with humans, including disclosure obligations for AI-generated content and chatbot interactions.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Stability AI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 11, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013768
Document ID
CA-D-00772
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
97243bfbcafaa8ec231cbf1c7f8c8ae3a12786517a8390a19011cdbe233bec46
Analysis generated
May 11, 2026 13:00 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stability AI
Document: Stability AI Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-013768
Captured: 2026-05-11 13:00:52 UTC
SHA-256: 97243bfbcafaa8ec…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stability-ai/stability-ai-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-013768/ai-disclosure-and-non-deception-requirement/
Accessed: Aug. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stability AI's AI Disclosure and Non-Deception Requirement clause do?

This provision creates an affirmative disclosure obligation for operators deploying Stability AI outputs in user-facing contexts where AI involvement may not be self-evident, including chatbots, synthetic media, automated customer service, and content creation tools delivered without clear attribution.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, operators using Stability AI technology in consumer-facing products are required to disclose AI involvement when it is not apparent to the end user, and are prohibited from representing AI-generated outputs as human-created. This requirement applies across all deployment contexts covered by the AUP.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stability AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stability AI.