Sourcegraph Cody · Sourcegraph Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Supplemental Terms Hierarchy and Conflict Resolution

Medium severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Sourcegraph Cody changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Sourcegraph Cody Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

When a supplemental term such as the AI Terms of Use, Data Processing Agreement, or Security Exhibit conflicts with the base Terms of Service, the supplemental term governs on that subject matter. Each supplemental term activates only when its stated condition is met.

This analysis describes what Sourcegraph Cody's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes the contractual priority structure across all Sourcegraph legal documents, which determines which obligations and limitations apply to a given customer in cases of conflict. Legal teams must assess which supplemental terms are triggered by their specific agreement conditions to understand the complete applicable framework.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The agreement establishes that supplemental terms override the base Terms of Service on covered subject matter when conflicts arise. Under this clause, the specific obligations that apply to a given user or customer depend on which supplemental terms are activated by their particular circumstances, such as agreement date, order form inclusions, or Government status.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Supplemental Terms Hierarchy and Conflict Resolution and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Sourcegraph Cody has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The following documents supplement the Sourcegraph Terms of Service and apply when the described conditions are met. Where a Supplemental Term conflicts with the Sourcegraph Terms of Service, the Supplemental Term controls with respect to the subject matter it covers.

Excerpt from Sourcegraph Cody's Sourcegraph Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The layered structure of this agreement engages general contract law principles regarding order of precedence and does not itself directly implicate a specific regulatory framework, but the downstream documents it activates (DPA, Privacy Policy, Security Exhibit) engage GDPR, CCPA, and applicable data protection law. The enforceability of tiered agreement structures may vary by jurisdiction. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The conditional activation structure means that the effective contractual terms for any given enterprise customer cannot be determined from the base Terms of Service alone. Procurement and legal teams must audit agreement execution dates and order form contents to establish which supplemental terms apply. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK customers should verify that activated supplemental terms, particularly the Data Processing Agreement, satisfy GDPR and UK GDPR requirements for controller-processor contracts. California customers should confirm CCPA service provider contractual requirements are met through the applicable activated documents. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams should treat this provision as a trigger for full-document review across all listed supplemental terms. The provision asserts that supplemental terms control on their subject matter, which is a standard commercial drafting approach, but the practical effect depends on which supplements are incorporated by reference into a given order form. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should map each activated supplemental term to the operational workflows it governs and confirm that internal data handling, acceptable use, and AI governance policies align with the applicable supplement. Where order forms are periodically renewed, teams should verify whether supplemental term applicability changes upon renewal.

Full institutional analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Start Professional · $99/mo Start with Monitor · $29/mo

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over unfair or deceptive practices in consumer and business contracts, including the clarity and enforceability of tiered terms structures.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Sourcegraph Terms of Service
Entity
Sourcegraph Cody
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-016477
Document ID
CA-D-00798
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
dad75d49ec42e4dcb95115df4cffd9c23f9fd8521852c37fb825a6c4e1c61312
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 14:41 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Sourcegraph Cody
Document: Sourcegraph Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-016477
Captured: 2026-07-09 14:41:59 UTC
SHA-256: dad75d49ec42e4dc…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/sourcegraph-cody/sourcegraph-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-016477/supplemental-terms-hierarchy-and-conflict-resolution/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
Start Professional · $99/mo Start with Monitor · $29/mo

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Sourcegraph Cody's Supplemental Terms Hierarchy and Conflict Resolution clause do?

This provision establishes the contractual priority structure across all Sourcegraph legal documents, which determines which obligations and limitations apply to a given customer in cases of conflict. Legal teams must assess which supplemental terms are triggered by their specific agreement conditions to understand the complete applicable framework.

How does this clause affect you?

The agreement establishes that supplemental terms override the base Terms of Service on covered subject matter when conflicts arise. Under this clause, the specific obligations that apply to a given user or customer depend on which supplemental terms are activated by their particular circumstances, such as agreement date, order form inclusions, or Government status.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Sourcegraph Cody?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Sourcegraph Cody.