This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
This electronic document, and all other electronic documents referred to or incorporated herein, will be: (a) deemed for all purposes to be a "writing" or "in writing"...and (b) legally enforceable as a signed agreement.
Neither Party may assign, transfer or novate this Agreement, by operation of law or otherwise (“ Assign ”), without the other Party’s prior written consent, provided that subject to the remainder of this Section, either Party may freely Assign this Agreement to a successor in interest upon a merger ...
If you access third party services through Kling AI, you must comply with any terms and conditions applicable to those services.
"Neither party is bound by changes to an SOW unless the parties have entered into a Change Order with respect thereto.Excerpt from Snowflake's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Neither party is bound by changes to an SOW unless the parties have entered into a Change Order with respect thereto.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.