Provision record
Snowflake · Snowflake Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Arbitration location based on customer address or San Francisco

Common · 196 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Snowflake and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

If any part of these arbitration terms is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding...would allow class arbitration...this entire dispute resolution section will be unenforceable.

Credit Karma

you may reject the change by sending us written notice within 30 days of the change to Credit Karma's address for Notice, in which case your account with Credit Karma will be immediately terminated

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Arbitration hearings will be conducted in the JAMS office nearest Customer's United States mailing address set forth in the Order Form if initiated and selected by Customer, otherwise in San Francisco County, California, U.S.A.

Excerpt from Snowflake's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Snowflake Terms of Service
Entity
Snowflake
Date stated by the document
April 16, 2026
As printed in Snowflake’s text (version CA-V-007630), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 5, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006915, captured Sept. 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-055294
Document ID
CA-D-000697
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006915)
0e58e006f573da477446f7f7ccb68a178794431a2d3996def64f36ec6569fda8
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 05:52 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006915, captured Sept. 12, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007630, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Snowflake
Document: Snowflake Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-055294
Version: CA-V-006915
Captured: 2026-09-12 01:21:06 UTC
SHA-256: 0e58e006f573da47…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/snowflake/snowflake-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-055294/arbitration-location-based-on-customer-address-or-san-francisco/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Snowflake's Arbitration location based on customer address or San Francisco clause do?

The clause states: “Arbitration hearings will be conducted in the JAMS office nearest Customer's United States mailing address set forth in the Order Form if initiated and selected by Customer, otherwise in San Francisco County, California, U.S.A.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Snowflake?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.