Provision record
Snowflake · Snowflake Privacy Notice · View original document ↗

Multi-Jurisdiction Regional Document Structure

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 290 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Snowflake and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The page includes region-specific language alternates for Brazil, Italy, Korea, Japan, Spain, Germany, France, and English-default, suggesting Snowflake maintains jurisdiction-specific versions of its legal materials.

This analysis describes what Snowflake's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The existence of regional document variants means that the specific terms governing a customer's relationship with Snowflake may differ based on their geographic location, and customers should confirm which regional version applies to their engagement.

Interpretive note: The substantive differences between regional document versions cannot be assessed from the navigation page alone; the extent of jurisdictional variation requires review of each regional document.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium May 23, 2026

The updated Privacy Notice no longer includes explicit language stating that users 'may unsubscribe through unsubscribe links at any time.' This removal means the document no longer contains that specific commitment to unsubscribe availability. The updated terms still reference a Privacy Notice governing data processing and retain cookie-related disclosures, but the removal of the unsubscribe guarantee eliminates a documented mechanism users may have relied on. You can review the full Privacy Notice to understand current communication and preference management options.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 12, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 5149 other provisions on other platforms.

Change history

modified Jul 17, 2026

Previous generic multi-jurisdiction reference now explicitly addresses U.S. Government entity-specific terms with detailed definition and location reference.

View full change record →
added May 14, 2026

Introduction of multi-jurisdiction regional structure indicates expanded compliance with varying privacy regulations across different geographic regions and legal jurisdictions.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Customers in EU member states, Brazil, Japan, Korea, and other listed regions may be subject to different legal terms than US-based customers; confirming the applicable regional document version is relevant to understanding jurisdiction-specific rights such as GDPR data subject rights or LGPD rights in Brazil.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

If you choose to reveal any personal information about yourself to other users, you do so at your own risk. We strongly encourage you to use caution in disclosing any personal information online.

Skillshare Medium

When you are asked to provide information, you may decline to do so; but if you choose not to provide information that is necessary to provide some of our Services, you may not be able to use those Services.

Square Medium

to object to profiling activities based on our own legitimate interests

See all platforms with this clause type →
ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The multi-jurisdiction structure engages GDPR for EU/EEA users, the UK GDPR for UK users, Brazil's LGPD, Japan's APPI, South Korea's PIPA, and US state laws including CCPA.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Snowflake Privacy Notice
Entity
Snowflake
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011440
Document ID
CA-D-00698
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
60769425226218e4d3850b1ff435ee59cd7420a77ae22dcf51a12d1d25a94d4d
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 19:42 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Snowflake
Document: Snowflake Privacy Notice
Record ID: CA-P-011440
Captured: 2026-05-10 19:42:03 UTC
SHA-256: 60769425226218e4…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/snowflake/snowflake-privacy-notice/provision/CA-P-011440/multi-jurisdiction-regional-document-structure/
Accessed: Aug. 12, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Snowflake's Multi-Jurisdiction Regional Document Structure clause do?

The existence of regional document variants means that the specific terms governing a customer's relationship with Snowflake may differ based on their geographic location, and customers should confirm which regional version applies to their engagement.

How does this clause affect you?

Customers in EU member states, Brazil, Japan, Korea, and other listed regions may be subject to different legal terms than US-based customers; confirming the applicable regional document version is relevant to understanding jurisdiction-specific rights such as GDPR data subject rights or LGPD rights in Brazil.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Snowflake?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snowflake.