Runway · Runway Usage Policy · View original document ↗

Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) Prohibition

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique Β· 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Runway changes these terms. Get same-day alerts β†’
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Runway recorded 10 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Get same-day alerts β†’
Monitor governance changes for Runway Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts β†’

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits using Runway's tools to create or modify non-consensual intimate imagery of real individuals.

This analysis describes what Runway's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision addresses a category of AI-generated content that engages a growing body of federal and state legislation specifically targeting AI-generated NCII, including the DEFIANCE Act and numerous state statutes, making this prohibition legally material for both users and the platform.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, any attempt to generate or modify non-consensual intimate imagery using Runway's tools constitutes a policy violation subject to account suspension. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the output is distributed or used beyond the platform.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) Prohibition and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms β†’

Monitoring

Runway has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
β–Έ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Attempts to create or modify non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII)

Excerpt from Runway's Usage Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The DEFIANCE Act (signed into law 2024) creates a federal civil cause of action for victims of AI-generated NCII. Numerous states have enacted or are enacting statutes criminalizing or creating civil liability for NCII, including AI-generated versions. The FTC's authority over unfair or deceptive practices may also engage where platforms facilitate NCII generation. The EU's Digital Services Act imposes obligations on platforms regarding illegal content including NCII. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. AI-generated NCII represents one of the highest-profile regulatory and litigation risk areas for generative AI platforms. The prohibition in this policy aligns with emerging federal and state legal standards, though the policy does not describe the technical mechanisms used to detect attempted NCII generation. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: State-level NCII statutes vary significantly in scope, available remedies, and criminal versus civil classification. California, New York, Texas, Georgia, and Virginia, among others, have enacted relevant statutes. EU member states have obligations under the Digital Services Act and national-level criminal law. Platforms with global users face a patchwork of applicable requirements. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers should assess whether Runway's detection mechanisms for NCII attempts are technically documented and whether the policy creates any shared liability exposure for enterprise deployments where end users may attempt prohibited content generation. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should assess whether Runway's NCII prohibition is supported by documented technical detection controls and whether those controls are reflected in vendor risk assessments. Organizations deploying Runway in consumer-facing contexts should evaluate whether additional end-user terms or consent mechanisms are required under applicable state law.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes β†’ Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive practices by platforms and has engaged on AI-generated NCII as a consumer protection issue.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general in multiple jurisdictions have enforcement authority under state-level NCII statutes applicable to AI-generated content.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Runway Usage Policy
Entity
Runway
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-016459
Document ID
CA-D-00773
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
c85a33b83012d26c721d121f95a781982f488e98734ee73463ec44474f4eb9b0
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 14:38 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Runway
Document: Runway Usage Policy
Record ID: CA-P-016459
Captured: 2026-07-09 14:38:40 UTC
SHA-256: c85a33b83012d26c…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/runway/runway-usage-policy/provision/CA-P-016459/non-consensual-intimate-imagery-ncii-prohibition/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Runway's Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) Prohibition clause do?

This provision addresses a category of AI-generated content that engages a growing body of federal and state legislation specifically targeting AI-generated NCII, including the DEFIANCE Act and numerous state statutes, making this prohibition legally material for both users and the platform.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, any attempt to generate or modify non-consensual intimate imagery using Runway's tools constitutes a policy violation subject to account suspension. This prohibition applies regardless of whether the output is distributed or used beyond the platform.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Runway?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Runway.