This analysis describes what Runway's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The prohibition means users cannot use Runway to produce stylistic imitations of living artists, which has implications for creative and commercial projects.
Interpretive note: The excerpt does not define 'known' or clarify the threshold for what constitutes an identifiable style imitation. It is also unclear whether the prohibition extends to deceased artists or only living ones as stated.
Users are prohibited from generating content styled after any known, living artist.
How other platforms handle this
May harm the reputation of Tinder or its affiliates, meaning the uploading or sharing of content on the Tinder platform that is defamatory to Tinder or its affiliates or advocates misuse of the Service...
Political content, including for dissemination in electoral campaigns.
Unless paired with educational or charitable information, we also don't allow content that capitalizes on controversial or tragic events or references sensitive health or medical conditions.
"Attempts to create content in the style of a known, living artistExcerpt from Runway's Content Policy
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The prohibition means users cannot use Runway to produce stylistic imitations of living artists, which has implications for creative and commercial projects.
Users are prohibited from generating content styled after any known, living artist.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 245 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Runway.