Runway · Runway Content Policy · View original document ↗

Automated and Human Review of Content

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 141 of 352 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Runway recorded 9 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Runway Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Runway's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This establishes that user-submitted content and generated outputs are actively monitored by both machine and human reviewers, meaning no submission is purely private from internal review.

Interpretive note: The excerpt also states that Runway prioritizes reports related to child safety, which is an independent proposition omitted from the canonical claim.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Users' inputs and outputs are subject to automated and human review processes designed to detect and block harmful content.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

We use a combination of automated tools and human reviewers to enforce our content rules. This includes technology that proactively detects and removes certain types of prohibited material.

OpenAI Medium

We use automated systems and human review to identify and address content that violates our Terms, including our Usage Policies.

Microsoft Copilot Medium

we may use automated systems and humans to review content to identify suspected spam, viruses, fraud, phishing, malware, jailbreaking, or other illegal or harmful content or conduct.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Runway has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Runway uses a combination of automated systems and internal human review to detect and block harmful content in user inputs and outputs, and prioritizes reports related to child safety.

— Excerpt from Runway's Runway Content Policy

Applicable regulations

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA

Provision details

Document information
Document
Runway Content Policy
Entity
Runway
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-073993
Document ID
CA-D-00836
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
c85a33b83012d26c721d121f95a781982f488e98734ee73463ec44474f4eb9b0
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 15:58 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Runway
Document: Runway Content Policy
Record ID: CA-P-073993
Captured: 2026-07-12 15:58:23 UTC
SHA-256: c85a33b83012d26c…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/runway/runway-content-policy/provision/CA-P-073993/automated-and-human-review-of-content/
Accessed: July 12, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Runway's Automated and Human Review of Content clause do?

This establishes that user-submitted content and generated outputs are actively monitored by both machine and human reviewers, meaning no submission is purely private from internal review.

How does this clause affect you?

Users' inputs and outputs are subject to automated and human review processes designed to detect and block harmful content.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 141 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Runway?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Runway.