“If another player makes a complaint about your behavior, our advanced automated tools use these patterns of inappropriate behavior and grading system to compare your behavior over time with these patterns...and, if it is determined that you have engaged in inappropriate behavior, make a decision as to the consequences”
This analysis describes what Riot Games's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Consequences for in-game conduct are determined by an automated system, not necessarily by direct human review, with outcomes tied to a comparative behavioral grading process.
An automated system may determine whether you have engaged in inappropriate behavior and decide what consequences apply to you, based on comparison of your behavior over time against defined patterns.
How other platforms handle this
Such tools are used to support, and not replace, human review where required by law.
LinkedIn may offer you choices about whether you would like to use certain automated optimizations (e.g., to opt-out of automatic expansion of your specific targeting criteria or to participate in optimized bidding).
Mailchimp uses a combination of automated and human detection review processes to ensure that Members are complying with our Standard Terms of Use and this Acceptable Use Policy.
"If another player makes a complaint about your behavior, our advanced automated tools use these patterns of inappropriate behavior and grading system to compare your behavior over time with these patterns...and, if it is determined that you have engaged in inappropriate behavior, make a decision as to the consequencesExcerpt from Riot Games's Privacy Notice
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Consequences for in-game conduct are determined by an automated system, not necessarily by direct human review, with outcomes tied to a comparative behavioral grading process.
An automated system may determine whether you have engaged in inappropriate behavior and decide what consequences apply to you, based on comparison of your behavior over time against defined patterns.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Riot Games.