This analysis describes what Revolut's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause establishes the operational framework for automated eligibility determinations while creating a procedural mechanism for users to challenge those decisions. This addresses regulatory requirements for transparency and human review rights in automated decision-making that produces legally or commercially significant effects.
Users' access to credit and other products is subject to automated eligibility processes rather than human review at the initial stage. Users retain the ability to request human review or reconsideration of adverse automated decisions through specified channels, which the terms establish as the formal procedure for challenging such determinations.
How other platforms handle this
We use automated decision-making to help improve our products and services to you. For example, we may use automated technologies to send you job alert emails regarding roles that may be of interest to you based upon your search criteria...
Object to an automated decision-making (including profiling) in certain circumstances.
Request a review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data.
"We may use automated processes to make decisions about you. For example, we use automated processes to: make decisions about whether you are eligible to use certain Revolut products or services (for example, credit); help us detect fraud and keep your account safe. If you are affected by an automated decision that has a significant impact on you, you have the right to: ask us to reconsider the decision; ask us to have the decision reviewed by a person (rather than just a computer system). To do this, you can contact us at dpo@revolut.com.Excerpt from Revolut's Privacy Policy (Superseded URL)
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause establishes the operational framework for automated eligibility determinations while creating a procedural mechanism for users to challenge those decisions. This addresses regulatory requirements for transparency and human review rights in automated decision-making that produces legally or commercially significant effects.
Users' access to credit and other products is subject to automated eligibility processes rather than human review at the initial stage. Users retain the ability to request human review or reconsideration of adverse automated decisions through specified channels, which the terms establish as the formal procedure for challenging such determinations.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 216 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Revolut.