Replicate · Replicate Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Third-Party Model Additional Terms (Flux, Ideogram, Stability AI)

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time Replicate changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Replicate Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

Use of specific third-party models on Replicate (Flux, Ideogram, Stability AI) is subject to additional restrictions flowing down from the model providers, including prohibitions on use for surveillance, biometric processing, military purposes, and development of competing products. Redistribution or fine-tuning of Stability AI models requires a direct license from Stability AI. These restrictions apply to customers and must be flowed down to their own users where applicable.

This analysis describes what Replicate's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

These provisions impose use-case specific restrictions that go beyond Replicate's own acceptable use policy, including prohibitions on competitive product development using model outputs, surveillance applications, and biometric processing. Non-compliance by authorized users constitutes a breach by the customer under the agreement and triggers indemnification obligations.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under these clauses, customers using Flux, Ideogram, or Stability AI models through Replicate are subject to additional provider-specific restrictions that prohibit, among other things, using model outputs to build competing services, processing biometric data, conducting surveillance activities, and redistributing model weights without a direct license from Stability AI. These restrictions must be incorporated into customers' own downstream product terms where applicable.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Third-Party Model Additional Terms (Flux, Ideogram, Stability AI) and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Replicate has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You agree to fully comply with Third-Party Terms applicable to your use of the Services, including all Additional Terms and licenses associated with the Models that you choose to use through the Services. With respect to the FluxDev Model or any similar Flux Models, you shall not: use, modify, copy, reproduce, create Derivatives of, or distribute any technology owned by Black Forest Labs for (a) any military purposes, (b) purposes of surveillance, including any research or development relating to surveillance, (c) biometric processing... use or access the Black Forest Lab's models or Outputs to create, train or improve (direct or indirectly) a similar or competing product or service. You shall not: use User Input or User Output to develop any product, service, or technology that competes with Ideogram and Ideogram AI Model or Ideogram API. If you choose to use Stability model through Replicate for which you may download the code or weights and you then redistribute, download, rehost, or in any other manner create copies of the Stability AI Materials or Derivative Works, you agree that you are required to engage with Stability directly to obtain a license directly from Stability AI before such redistribution.

Excerpt from Replicate's Acceptable Use Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The prohibition on biometric processing using Flux models engages the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), GDPR Article 9 (special categories of personal data), and other biometric data regulations applicable in various jurisdictions. Export control regulations (EAR, ITAR) are implicated by the prohibition on military and weapons-related use. The prohibition on surveillance applications engages EU AI Act provisions on prohibited AI practices, including remote biometric identification and social scoring systems. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for organizations in competitive AI development, surveillance technology, or any application involving biometric data. The competitive product development prohibition (Flux and Ideogram) may be interpreted broadly and could affect organizations developing AI image generation or editing products. The Stability AI redistribution requirement for downloaded model weights creates a compliance checkpoint that must be operationalized before any fine-tuned Stability model is distributed. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU organizations operating under the AI Act should evaluate whether their use cases fall within prohibited or high-risk categories addressed by the third-party restrictions. Illinois BIPA applies to biometric data processing for Illinois residents regardless of where the organization is located. California, Texas, and Washington state biometric privacy laws may also be relevant. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations building commercial AI products on Replicate should review all applicable third-party model terms before product launch to ensure that their use case is not prohibited. The flow-down requirement (requiring customers to impose these restrictions on their own users) creates a due diligence and contract management obligation for platform developers. Failure to obtain a direct Stability AI license before redistributing fine-tuned models creates direct contractual breach exposure. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should establish a model-by-model compliance review process for any Replicate-hosted model used in commercial products, with particular attention to competitive product restrictions, biometric use prohibitions, and redistribution requirements. The requirement to flow down restrictions to downstream users should be operationalized in product terms of service and developer agreements.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes → Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over deceptive or unfair practices in AI product development and data use, including compliance with disclosed use restrictions in AI model licensing
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Replicate Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Replicate
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-074439
Document ID
CA-D-00841
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
6e158ac59e25bd27831c685c36128d67672522379cd78ffb80e77cda5b85e968
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 16:39 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Replicate
Document: Replicate Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-074439
Captured: 2026-07-12 16:39:46 UTC
SHA-256: 6e158ac59e25bd27…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/replicate/replicate-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-074439/third-party-model-additional-terms-flux-ideogram-stability-ai/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Replicate's Third-Party Model Additional Terms (Flux, Ideogram, Stability AI) clause do?

These provisions impose use-case specific restrictions that go beyond Replicate's own acceptable use policy, including prohibitions on competitive product development using model outputs, surveillance applications, and biometric processing. Non-compliance by authorized users constitutes a breach by the customer under the agreement and triggers indemnification obligations.

How does this clause affect you?

Under these clauses, customers using Flux, Ideogram, or Stability AI models through Replicate are subject to additional provider-specific restrictions that prohibit, among other things, using model outputs to build competing services, processing biometric data, conducting surveillance activities, and redistributing model weights without a direct license from Stability AI. These restrictions must be incorporated into customers' own downstream product terms where …

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Replicate?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Replicate.