This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Any access to or use of the Services or goods through your account by others, including your spouse, dependents, Recipients, and any access by AI Agents you enable or that operate on your behalf...
You agree that the provisions in this section will survive any termination of your Account, the Agreement and/or your access to the Services.
These indemnity obligations shall survive any expiration or termination of your relationship with Chegg.
"A party seeking indemnification under this Section 9 shall (i) provide the indemnifying party with prompt written notice upon becoming aware of any relevant claim, (ii) reasonably cooperate in the defense...and (iii) allow the indemnifying party sole control of defense and settlement...Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity API Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “A party seeking indemnification under this Section 9 shall (i) provide the indemnifying party with prompt written notice upon becoming aware of any relevant claim, (ii) reasonably cooperate in the defense...and (iii) allow the indemnifying party sole control of defense and settlement...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 229 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.