“Peacock and you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement...will be resolved in federal or state (including small claims) court, and neither party will be required to arbitrate any claims against the other.”
This analysis describes what Peacock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause is consequential because it affirmatively preserves court access for both parties and forecloses mandatory arbitration as a dispute-resolution mechanism.
A user retains the right to bring claims in court and cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration by Peacock.
How other platforms handle this
If you use the Anyscale Services on behalf of a business or organization, You and Anyscale agree to resolve any dispute, claim, or controversy...pursuant to Section 10.5.
This section does not require informal dispute resolution or arbitration of the following claims: (i) individual claims brought in small claims court...
The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and not appealable, and judgment on the arbitration award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
"Peacock and you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement...will be resolved in federal or state (including small claims) court, and neither party will be required to arbitrate any claims against the other.Excerpt from Peacock's Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause is consequential because it affirmatively preserves court access for both parties and forecloses mandatory arbitration as a dispute-resolution mechanism.
A user retains the right to bring claims in court and cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration by Peacock.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Peacock.