Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Peacock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause is consequential because it affirmatively preserves court access for both parties and forecloses mandatory arbitration as a dispute-resolution mechanism.
A user retains the right to bring claims in court and cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration by Peacock.
How other platforms handle this
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
all Disputes arising out of or relating to the Class Action Waiver, including any claim that all or part of the Class Action Waiver is unenforceable...shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction and not by an arbitrator...
except disputes relating to the enforcement or validity of your, your licensors', our, or our licensors' intellectual property rights
Monitoring
Peacock has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"Peacock and you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement...will be resolved in federal or state (including small claims) court, and neither party will be required to arbitrate any claims against the other.Excerpt from Peacock's Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause is consequential because it affirmatively preserves court access for both parties and forecloses mandatory arbitration as a dispute-resolution mechanism.
A user retains the right to bring claims in court and cannot be compelled to submit to arbitration by Peacock.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 210 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Peacock.