Provision record
OpenRouter · OpenRouter Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Prohibition on Weapons Development Assistance

High severity Low confidence Inferredfromcontext Common · 282 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track OpenRouter and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity OpenRouter recorded 10 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Follow OpenRouter →
Monitor governance changes for OpenRouter Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow OpenRouter →

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits using the platform to generate content or assistance that facilitates the development of weapons of mass destruction, including biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological weapons.

This analysis describes what OpenRouter's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes a categorical prohibition on a class of uses that would create significant legal liability and aligns the platform with export control and national security regulatory frameworks applicable to dual-use technologies.

Interpretive note: The exact verbatim policy text was not available in the provided HTML source; the specific categories of prohibited weapons-related content may differ from this characterization.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, any use of OpenRouter's platform to obtain assistance with weapons of mass destruction development is prohibited and may result in account termination and referral to relevant authorities.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

You may not display any personal contact, banking, or peer-to-peer payment information, whether in relation to you or any other person (for example, names, home addresses or postcodes, telephone numbers, email addresses, URLs, credit/debit card...)

ActiveCampaign Medium

Bypass or ignore instructions contained in our robots.txt file that controls automated access to portions of our Services;

Mailchimp Medium

Send content created in Mailchimp through another service.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

OpenRouter has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow OpenRouter → Or create a free account →
ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages US Export Administration Regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, and potentially provisions of 18 U.S.C. governing material support for terrorism and weapons programs. The Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security and the Department of State Directorate of Defense Trade Controls are relevant enforcement authorities. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. Platforms providing AI-assisted content generation have increasing regulatory scrutiny regarding dual-use capabilities, and failure to enforce this prohibition creates significant federal legal exposure. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: This prohibition has global applicability given the international nature of the regulatory frameworks involved. Operators with international user bases should assess export control compliance in addition to platform-level enforcement. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Operators should ensure downstream terms explicitly prohibit this use category and should assess whether their user base creates elevated risk requiring enhanced monitoring. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal and compliance teams should assess whether the platform's technical safeguards are sufficient to detect and block attempts to use the platform for prohibited weapons-related queries, and whether incident response procedures are in place.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has general consumer protection jurisdiction over platform enforcement representations and practices
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
OpenRouter Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
OpenRouter
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 20, 2026
Last verified
May 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012487
Document ID
CA-D-00851
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
4f9b01b3bff22d616aaa6ee0984a955e891ae572c1d564d966d4eb4f67d941e7
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 21:54 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: OpenRouter
Document: OpenRouter Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-012487
Captured: 2026-05-20 21:54:28 UTC
SHA-256: 4f9b01b3bff22d61…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/openrouter/openrouter-acceptable-use-policy/provision/CA-P-012487/prohibition-on-weapons-development-assistance/
Accessed: July 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Stay ahead of the changes

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OpenRouter's Prohibition on Weapons Development Assistance clause do?

This provision establishes a categorical prohibition on a class of uses that would create significant legal liability and aligns the platform with export control and national security regulatory frameworks applicable to dual-use technologies.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, any use of OpenRouter's platform to obtain assistance with weapons of mass destruction development is prohibited and may result in account termination and referral to relevant authorities.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 282 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with OpenRouter?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenRouter.