The agreement requires users to evaluate Output for accuracy before use, prohibits reliance on Output as a sole factual source or substitute for professional advice, and expressly prohibits use of Output about a person for decisions with legal or material impact including credit, employment, housing, insurance, legal, and medical decisions.
This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes affirmative user obligations regarding Output evaluation and creates an express prohibition on high-stakes decisional use of Output concerning individuals. These obligations are operationally significant for any enterprise or professional deploying AI-generated content in decision-making workflows.
⚠ Users who use Output in violation of this clause for high-stakes decisions about individuals may be subject to account termination and may face regulatory exposure under applicable civil rights and consumer protection laws outside of these terms
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Output Accuracy Disclaimer and Reliance Prohibition and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"Output may not always be accurate. You should not rely on Output from our Services as a sole source of truth or factual information, or as a substitute for professional advice. You must evaluate Output for accuracy and appropriateness for your use case, including using human review as appropriate, before using or sharing Output from the Services. You must not use any Output relating to a person for any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, such as making credit, educational, employment, housing, insurance, legal, medical, or other important decisions about them.Excerpt from OpenAI's Terms of Use
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The prohibition on using Output for credit, employment, housing, insurance, and similar decisions engages the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Housing Act, Title VII, and related civil rights statutes that govern automated …
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This provision establishes affirmative user obligations regarding Output evaluation and creates an express prohibition on high-stakes decisional use of Output concerning individuals. These obligations are operationally significant for any enterprise or professional deploying AI-generated content in decision-making workflows.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.