This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the operational framework through which OpenAI addresses potential misuse vectors in its model deployment. The documented risk assessment and mitigation measures outline the entity's approach to monitoring and constraining uses involving synthetic content generation at scale and coordinated inauthentic activities.
Interpretive note: The precise verbatim phrasing of the influence operations provision was reconstructed from the system card's described content areas; exact wording may vary from the published document as the source HTML was truncated.
Users operate under usage policies that prohibit employing GPT-4o for coordinated inauthentic behavior and disinformation generation. The terms authorize OpenAI to apply detection systems that identify and enforce against content that violates these policies.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Influence Operations and Disinformation Risk and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"We assessed GPT-4o's potential to be used for influence operations, including generating persuasive content at scale, creating fake personas, and producing targeted disinformation. We concluded this represents a medium risk, and have implemented mitigations including usage policies prohibiting use for coordinated inauthentic behavior and detection systems for policy-violating content.— Excerpt from OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card (PDF)
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the operational framework through which OpenAI addresses potential misuse vectors in its model deployment. The documented risk assessment and mitigation measures outline the entity's approach to monitoring and constraining uses involving synthetic content generation at scale and coordinated inauthentic activities.
Users operate under usage policies that prohibit employing GPT-4o for coordinated inauthentic behavior and disinformation generation. The terms authorize OpenAI to apply detection systems that identify and enforce against content that violates these policies.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.