This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This risk acknowledgment establishes OpenAI's stated awareness of behavioral engagement patterns associated with the system's design. The documentation of this concern serves as part of the system card's risk disclosure framework, informing stakeholders about documented usage pattern risks the developer has identified.
This passage does not impose obligations, restrict user conduct, or authorize specific data practices. It functions as a risk disclosure within the system documentation rather than as an operative contractual or use-restriction provision. Users encounter this information as part of OpenAI's documented risk assessment rather than as a binding term governing service use.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Emotional Over-Reliance and Anthropomorphization Risk and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"GPT-4o can be expressive and engaging in ways that could foster excessive engagement or emotional reliance beyond what is in their long-term interest... We are worried about the potential for users to become excessively emotionally reliant on GPT-4o, whether through interacting with it as a substitute for human connection or in other ways that might not be in the long-term interest of the user.— Excerpt from OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card (PDF)
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This risk acknowledgment establishes OpenAI's stated awareness of behavioral engagement patterns associated with the system's design. The documentation of this concern serves as part of the system card's risk disclosure framework, informing stakeholders about documented usage pattern risks the developer has identified.
This passage does not impose obligations, restrict user conduct, or authorize specific data practices. It functions as a risk disclosure within the system documentation rather than as an operative contractual or use-restriction provision. Users encounter this information as part of OpenAI's documented risk assessment rather than as a binding term governing service use.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.