This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the documented risk classification that informs OpenAI's deployment decisions and safety monitoring protocols for the model. The Medium risk designation indicates the company has determined mitigation measures are required but that continued deployment is warranted under the stated risk threshold.
This provision does not directly impose obligations or restrictions on users. It describes OpenAI's internal risk assessment of the model's capabilities, which may inform how the service is monitored, what usage policies are enforced, or what additional safeguards are implemented during operation.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle CBRN Frontier Risk Evaluation and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We evaluated GPT-4o for its potential to provide serious uplift to those seeking to create biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological weapons with the potential for mass casualties. We assessed GPT-4o to be Medium risk per our Preparedness Framework... While the model has the potential to meaningfully uplift those seeking to create biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological weapons, the level of uplift provided does not yet meet our threshold for Critical risk.— Excerpt from OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card (PDF)
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the documented risk classification that informs OpenAI's deployment decisions and safety monitoring protocols for the model. The Medium risk designation indicates the company has determined mitigation measures are required but that continued deployment is warranted under the stated risk threshold.
This provision does not directly impose obligations or restrictions on users. It describes OpenAI's internal risk assessment of the model's capabilities, which may inform how the service is monitored, what usage policies are enforced, or what additional safeguards are implemented during operation.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.