This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This assessment documents OpenAI's evaluation of a specific capability risk category as part of its safety and preparedness procedures. The classification and capability analysis inform the entity's approach to model deployment, access controls, and ongoing monitoring protocols for this risk dimension.
This provision does not establish user-facing terms, obligations, or authorizations. It represents OpenAI's internal risk classification methodology and findings regarding model capabilities in a defined threat domain, which may inform access policies or usage restrictions established through separate terms of service.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle CBRN Uplift Risk Assessment and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"We have evaluated GPT-4o according to our Preparedness Framework and assessed the overall risk level as medium for CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear) threats. GPT-4o provides meaningful uplift to those seeking to create biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological weapons with the potential for mass casualties.— Excerpt from OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card (PDF)
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This assessment documents OpenAI's evaluation of a specific capability risk category as part of its safety and preparedness procedures. The classification and capability analysis inform the entity's approach to model deployment, access controls, and ongoing monitoring protocols for this risk dimension.
This provision does not establish user-facing terms, obligations, or authorizations. It represents OpenAI's internal risk classification methodology and findings regarding model capabilities in a defined threat domain, which may inform access policies or usage restrictions established through separate terms of service.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.