Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This provision requires users who submit any feedback about the Service to assign full intellectual property ownership of that feedback to OneLogin, with no compensation and no restrictions on OneLogin's use.
This analysis describes what OneLogin's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes that any technical, product, or operational feedback submitted by users, including bug reports and improvement suggestions, becomes the sole property of OneLogin upon submission, with no retained rights or compensation for the submitting party.
Under this clause, the agreement transfers all intellectual property rights in any feedback submitted about the Service to OneLogin, including detailed technical feedback from enterprise customers, without any obligation to compensate the submitting user or entity.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Feedback Assignment and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
OneLogin has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"If you provide any feedback to OneLogin concerning the functionality and performance of the Service (including identifying potential errors and improvements), you hereby assign to OneLogin all right, title, and interest in and to the feedback, and OneLogin is free to use the feedback without payment or restriction.Excerpt from OneLogin's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Feedback assignment clauses are generally enforceable under U.S. contract law and are common in SaaS agreements. However, organizations whose employees submit feedback may want to assess whether the assignment clause interacts with internal IP ownership policies or employment agreements. No specific regulatory framework directly governs feedback assignment in this context. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low. This provision is standard across SaaS platforms and the primary implication is that users cannot assert proprietary claims over feedback they submit. The clause does not grant OneLogin rights to underlying user data or content beyond the feedback itself. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU-based organizations with strict internal IP governance policies should assess whether employee feedback submissions may inadvertently transfer organizationally valuable technical insights. California employees have specific IP assignment protections under California Labor Code Section 2870, which limits the scope of employee IP assignments; the interaction between this clause and that statute may warrant review. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers whose teams regularly engage in technical feedback cycles with SaaS vendors should document this clause in vendor assessments and consider whether internal IP policies should address feedback submissions to third-party platforms. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations should inform relevant internal teams that technical feedback submitted to OneLogin is assigned to OneLogin under the terms of this agreement and cannot be claimed as proprietary organizational IP.
Full institutional analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes that any technical, product, or operational feedback submitted by users, including bug reports and improvement suggestions, becomes the sole property of OneLogin upon submission, with no retained rights or compensation for the submitting party.
Under this clause, the agreement transfers all intellectual property rights in any feedback submitted about the Service to OneLogin, including detailed technical feedback from enterprise customers, without any obligation to compensate the submitting user or entity.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OneLogin.