This analysis describes what NVIDIA NIM's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
The indemnification obligations...are subject to the indemnifying Party (a) receiving a prompt written notice of such claim from the indemnified Party, (b) being granted the exclusive right to control and direct...the investigation, defense, or settlement strategy...
Customer must provide us with prompt written notice of any Claim Against Customer and allow us the right to assume the exclusive defense and control...
The party seeking indemnity...must give the other party...the following: (i) prompt written notice of any claim...,(ii) all cooperation and assistance reasonably requested by the Indemnitor in the defense of the claim...and (iii) sole control over the defense and settlement of the claim...
"The indemnifying party is notified promptly in writing by the indemnified party of any Indemnifiable Claim and the indemnified party will reasonably cooperate with the indemnifying party in the defense of the Indemnifiable Claim, at the indemnifying party's expense.Excerpt from NVIDIA NIM's Terms of Use
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “The indemnifying party is notified promptly in writing by the indemnified party of any Indemnifiable Claim and the indemnified party will reasonably cooperate with the indemnifying party in the defense of the Indemnifiable Claim, at the indemnifying party's expense.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NVIDIA NIM.