Provision record
NVIDIA NIM · NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP · View original document ↗

Prohibition on Deceptive Impersonation Using AI

High severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 142 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track NVIDIA NIM and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Users cannot use NVIDIA's AI services to create fake content that misleadingly presents itself as being from or depicting a real person, including deepfakes or synthetic media of real individuals who have not consented.

ⓘ

This analysis describes what NVIDIA NIM's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision directly addresses synthetic media and deepfake generation, which is an area of active legislative and regulatory development in the U.S. and EU, and establishes that such use constitutes a prohibited activity under the agreement.

⚠

Interpretive note: The document does not define the threshold between prohibited deceptive impersonation and permitted uses such as clearly labeled satire or parody involving real individuals, which may require case-by-case assessment.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Individuals whose likenesses or identities are used by third parties through NVIDIA NIM in violation of this provision have a basis for reporting the violation to NVIDIA, though the document does not specify a complaint mechanism for affected third parties.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

We use a combination of automated tools and human reviewers to enforce our content rules. This includes technology that proactively detects and removes certain types of prohibited material.

Glassdoor Medium

We moderate Content using proprietary technology that analyzes multiple attributes of the content for compliance with our Guidelines. If the Content does not pass technological review, it is rejected and not made visible on our services.

Eufy Medium

You must not submit any user content to Anker's Services that is or has ever been the subject of any threatened or actual legal proceedings or other similar complaints.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not use the Services to generate content that impersonates any real person, living or deceased, in a deceptive or misleading manner, or to create synthetic media that falsely depicts real individuals without their consent.

Excerpt from NVIDIA NIM's NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the FTC Act's prohibition on deceptive practices, state-level deepfake statutes including those in California, Texas, and New York, and the EU AI Act's provisions on AI-generated synthetic content and transparency …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA

Provision details

Document information
Document
NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP
Entity
NVIDIA NIM
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011965
Document ID
CA-D-00821
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
41d8df21537bcb19cecceb53970dcae928102707e3b71a722cc1b090cbf6a1c6
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 16:37 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: NVIDIA NIM
Document: NVIDIA AI Foundation Models AUP
Record ID: CA-P-011965
Captured: 2026-05-12 16:37:18 UTC
SHA-256: 41d8df21537bcb19…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/nvidia-nim/nvidia-ai-foundation-models-aup/provision/CA-P-011965/prohibition-on-deceptive-impersonation-using-ai/
Accessed: Sept. 26, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does NVIDIA NIM's Prohibition on Deceptive Impersonation Using AI clause do?

This provision directly addresses synthetic media and deepfake generation, which is an area of active legislative and regulatory development in the U.S. and EU, and establishes that such use constitutes a prohibited activity under the agreement.

How does this clause affect you?

Individuals whose likenesses or identities are used by third parties through NVIDIA NIM in violation of this provision have a basis for reporting the violation to NVIDIA, though the document does not specify a complaint mechanism for affected third parties.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 142 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with NVIDIA NIM?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by NVIDIA NIM.