The agreement states that California law governs all disputes, and that exclusive jurisdiction is vested in the federal courts of the Northern District of California and the state courts of California. Both parties consent to this jurisdiction and waive forum non conveniens challenges.
This analysis describes what Modal's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes that all disputes must be litigated in California courts under California law, regardless of where the Customer is located or incorporated. The forum non conveniens waiver means Customers cannot seek to transfer proceedings to a more convenient or locally accessible court.
Under this clause, disputes arising from the agreement must be brought in California courts under California law, and Customers waive the right to challenge the appropriateness of California as the forum. For non-US Customers, this creates a geographic and jurisdictional requirement to litigate in the United States. Note that the DPA separately specifies Sweden as the governing law for EU SCC-related disputes and England and Wales for UK transfers.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Governing Law and Exclusive Jurisdiction in California and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"This Agreement shall be governed exclusively by, and construed exclusively in accordance with, the laws of the United States and the State of California, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. The federal courts of the United States in the Northern District of California and the state courts of the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement. Each party hereby consents to the jurisdiction of such courts and waives any right it may otherwise have to challenge the appropriateness of such forums, whether on the basis of the doctrine of forum non conveniens or otherwise.Excerpt from Modal's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Mandatory California jurisdiction clauses in B2B agreements are generally enforceable under US law between commercial parties.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision establishes that all disputes must be litigated in California courts under California law, regardless of where the Customer is located or incorporated. The forum non conveniens waiver means Customers cannot seek to transfer proceedings to a more convenient or locally accessible court.
Under this clause, disputes arising from the agreement must be brought in California courts under California law, and Customers waive the right to challenge the appropriateness of California as the forum. For non-US Customers, this creates a geographic and jurisdictional requirement to litigate in the United States. Note that the DPA separately specifies Sweden as the governing law for EU …
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Modal.