Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The document discloses that API access to Mistral Medium 3.5 is priced at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens.
This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the commercial rate structure applicable to API consumption of Mistral Medium 3.5; organizations with high-volume or production API usage should account for these rates in vendor contract and budget planning.
Under this pricing structure, API users are charged $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; costs scale directly with usage volume and the token composition of requests and responses.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle API Token-Based Pricing and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Mistral AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Price i $ 1.5 /M Tokens $ 7.5 /M TokensExcerpt from Mistral AI's Mistral Medium 3.5 Model Card
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Token-based pricing for AI API services does not directly engage a specific consumer protection statute in most jurisdictions, but the FTC's authority over unfair or deceptive pricing practices would apply if pricing terms were materially misleading. EU consumer protection directives may require clear price disclosure for business-to-consumer API offerings. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low. The pricing disclosure is explicit and specific; the primary compliance consideration is ensuring that downstream products built on the API accurately represent costs to end users where required by applicable consumer protection law. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA B2C deployments that pass API costs to end consumers may need to satisfy price transparency requirements under EU consumer law. California's consumer protection framework may similarly apply to downstream pricing representations. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should confirm whether the disclosed pricing is subject to change and on what notice, as the model card does not state whether rates are contractually fixed or subject to revision; this would need to be established in a separate service agreement or terms of service. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations with material API spend should review Mistral's full platform terms to determine billing dispute procedures, rate change notification requirements, and any volume discount or enterprise pricing structures that may apply.
This provision establishes the commercial rate structure applicable to API consumption of Mistral Medium 3.5; organizations with high-volume or production API usage should account for these rates in vendor contract and budget planning.
Under this pricing structure, API users are charged $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; costs scale directly with usage volume and the token composition of requests and responses.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.