Track 3 platforms and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
This is the official model card for Mistral Medium 3.5, a multimodal AI model released by Mistral AI under a Modified MIT License that permits commercial use. The document discloses that the model accepts text and image inputs, produces text outputs, supports a 128,000-token context window, and is optimized for agentic workflows, coding, and instruction-following tasks. The card lists explicit prohibited uses including generation of malicious code, disinformation, CSAM, and content facilitating weapons development, and notes that deployers who build on the open-weights release are responsible for implementing additional safety measures appropriate to their specific use cases.
This document is a model card published by Mistral AI governing the Mistral Medium 3.5 large language model (version v26.04), describing its technical specifications, intended use cases, safety posture, and licensing terms; it does not assert a bilateral contractual basis but instead functions as a technical disclosure and governance reference for deployers and developers. The card states the model is released under a Modified MIT License, is optimized for agentic and coding use cases with native multimodal (vision) capabilities, supports a 128k token context window, and is described as a frontier-class model available both via API and as downloadable open weights. The document discloses prohibited use categories including generation of malicious code, disinformation, content that facilitates violence or exploitation of minors, and use in weapons development, while noting the model incorporates safety training and system prompt override resistance; however, as open weights, downstream deployers bear primary responsibility for use-case-specific safety controls, creating a governance gap that the card does not fully resolve. The card engages with the EU AI Act framework by classifying the model as general-purpose AI and noting conformity assessment obligations that may apply to high-risk downstream deployments, while also referencing Mistral AI's usage policies at mistral.ai/terms; the open-weights release structure creates jurisdiction-dependent compliance obligations for deployers, particularly under the EU AI Act's provider and deployer distinction.
Institutional analysis available with Compliance
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.
Get ComplianceMonitoring
Mistral AI has updated this document before.
Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Get ComplianceCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Deployer Responsibility for Downstream Safety and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.