Provision record
Mistral AI · Mistral Medium 3.5 Model Card · View original document ↗

Moderation and Content Filtering Endpoints

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Mistral AI and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Mistral AI recorded 2 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Follow Mistral AI →
Monitor governance changes for Mistral AI Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Mistral AI →

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Document Record

What it is

The document discloses that Mistral Medium 3.5 includes dedicated API endpoints for content moderation (/v1/moderations) and chat-specific moderation (/v1/chat/moderations), available as callable features.

This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The availability of moderation endpoints as a disclosed feature indicates that downstream deployers may use the model to evaluate content for policy compliance; the governance implications depend on how these endpoints are used within downstream platforms, particularly in contexts governed by the EU Digital Services Act or platform-specific content moderation obligations.

Interpretive note: The model card discloses the existence of moderation endpoints but does not describe the moderation criteria, accuracy benchmarks, or data handling terms applicable to content submitted through these endpoints.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this disclosure, the API authorizes submission of user-generated or system-generated content to moderation endpoints; downstream platforms using these endpoints may route user content through Mistral's moderation infrastructure as part of their content review workflows.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Moderation and Content Filtering Endpoints and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

Mistral AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Mistral AI → Or get the research letter, free →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Moderations /v1/moderations Chat Moderations /v1/chat/moderations

Excerpt from Mistral AI's Mistral Medium 3.5 Model Card

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The EU Digital Services Act (DSA) imposes content moderation obligations on online platforms; downstream operators using Mistral's moderation endpoints to fulfill DSA obligations should assess whether reliance on a third-party AI moderation API satisfies DSA accountability and auditability requirements. GDPR applies to personal data processed through moderation endpoints. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Moderation endpoints process content that may include personal data, user communications, or sensitive speech; the legal basis for processing and the accuracy of moderation outputs are governance considerations for downstream platform operators. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA platform operators subject to the DSA face heightened obligations regarding transparency, appeal rights, and auditability of automated content moderation decisions; reliance on a third-party AI API for moderation may require disclosure and human oversight mechanisms. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Platform operators using moderation endpoints should ensure their DPA with Mistral AI addresses the specific data processing activities involved in moderation, including retention of flagged content, output logging, and subprocessor chains. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams at downstream platform operators should evaluate whether automated moderation via this API satisfies applicable due process and transparency requirements under the DSA, national platform liability frameworks, or internal acceptable use policy commitments.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over deceptive or unfair practices in AI-based content moderation systems, including where moderation outputs affect consumer access or speech.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Mistral Medium 3.5 Model Card
Entity
Mistral AI
Document last updated
July 6, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 6, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-016366
Document ID
CA-D-00926
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
88eca3420b6ce31fa31ab0a83ae65c7ba047558b8ee7d5277913bca4724ee705
Analysis generated
July 6, 2026 22:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Mistral AI
Document: Mistral Medium 3.5 Model Card
Record ID: CA-P-016366
Captured: 2026-07-06 22:17:07 UTC
SHA-256: 88eca3420b6ce31f…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/mistral-ai/mistral-medium-35-model-card/provision/CA-P-016366/moderation-and-content-filtering-endpoints/
Accessed: July 28, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Stay ahead of the changes

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Mistral AI's Moderation and Content Filtering Endpoints clause do?

The availability of moderation endpoints as a disclosed feature indicates that downstream deployers may use the model to evaluate content for policy compliance; the governance implications depend on how these endpoints are used within downstream platforms, particularly in contexts governed by the EU Digital Services Act or platform-specific content moderation obligations.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this disclosure, the API authorizes submission of user-generated or system-generated content to moderation endpoints; downstream platforms using these endpoints may route user content through Mistral's moderation infrastructure as part of their content review workflows.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Mistral AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.