The document discloses that Microsoft operates an AI Red Team that has conducted risk identification across more than 100 generative AI products, and that Microsoft publishes security best practices derived from this program.
This analysis describes what Microsoft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This disclosure establishes that Microsoft conducts adversarial security testing across a defined scope of generative AI products and publishes findings; organizations assessing Microsoft AI products as part of vendor security due diligence may reference this program as a component of their evaluation.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle AI Red Team and Security Safeguards Disclosure and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"Identifying potential risk in more than 100 generative AI products Read the blog Engineering Sharing security best practices from the Microsoft AI Red Team Learn more Engineering Spotlighting how Microsoft protects AI platforms against cyberthreats Read the blogExcerpt from Microsoft's Responsible AI
1.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This disclosure establishes that Microsoft conducts adversarial security testing across a defined scope of generative AI products and publishes findings; organizations assessing Microsoft AI products as part of vendor security due diligence may reference this program as a component of their evaluation.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Microsoft.