This analysis describes what MetaMask's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Such tools are used to support, and not replace, human review where required by law.
LinkedIn may offer you choices about whether you would like to use certain automated optimizations (e.g., to opt-out of automatic expansion of your specific targeting criteria or to participate in optimized bidding).
Preparedness evals
"By using these specific features, you acknowledge that you are interacting with an automated system rather than a natural person.Excerpt from MetaMask's Terms of Use
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “By using these specific features, you acknowledge that you are interacting with an automated system rather than a natural person.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by MetaMask.