Provision record
Medium · Medium Terms of Service · View original document ↗

California courts have exclusive jurisdiction over arbitration appeals

Common · 264 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Medium and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Medium's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Workday

If any dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court, then the state and federal courts located in Alameda County, California, will have exclusive jurisdiction.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You and Medium agree that the state or federal courts of the State of California and the United States sitting in San Francisco, California have exclusive jurisdiction over any appeals and the enforcement of an arbitration award.

Excerpt from Medium's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Medium Terms of Service
Entity
Medium
Date stated by the document
Sept. 1, 2020
As printed in Medium’s text (version CA-V-006384), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 20, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006384, captured Sept. 4, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-035862
Document ID
CA-D-000245
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-006384)
0fc65ff94a7a60e62dd2910b49c201d4a4fec11167b7b7bfdb9eeb5b1bae3de3
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 04:26 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006384, captured Sept. 4, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Medium
Document: Medium Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-035862
Version: CA-V-006384
Captured: 2026-09-04 00:42:12 UTC
SHA-256: 0fc65ff94a7a60e6…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/medium/medium-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-035862/california-courts-have-exclusive-jurisdiction-over-arbitration-appeals/
Accessed: Oct. 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Medium's California courts have exclusive jurisdiction over arbitration appeals clause do?

The clause states: “You and Medium agree that the state or federal courts of the State of California and the United States sitting in San Francisco, California have exclusive jurisdiction over any appeals and the enforcement of an arbitration award.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Medium?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Medium.