This analysis describes what Luma AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Third Party Services and Third Party Output are subject to their own terms, and we are not responsible for them.
The provisions of this Section 5.2 will supersede any non-disclosure agreement by and between the Parties...that would purport to address the confidentiality and security of Customer Property, and such agreement will have no further force or effect...
you shall not without our prior written consent, assign, transfer, novate, part with, outsource, subcontract or delegate any of your rights, responsibilities and/or obligations under this Agreement (in whole or in part)
"Input is not subject to the confidentiality obligations of Section 13.Excerpt from Luma AI's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Input is not subject to the confidentiality obligations of Section 13.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Luma AI.