The agreement states that deleting a Luma account does not terminate the licenses granted over Input or Output that Luma has already incorporated into its systems, AI models, or aggregated data before the deletion request was made.
This analysis describes what Luma AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes that the account deletion right does not function as a complete data rights mechanism where Input has already been used in model training or aggregated data. The operational scope of this carve-out depends on Luma's internal data pipeline timelines, which are not disclosed in the document.
Provision name changed from 'Account Deletion Does Not Terminate Existing Licenses' to 'Account Deletion Does Not Revoke Input Licenses' for precision; text content is identical.
View full change record →Under this clause, users who delete their accounts retain no ability under this agreement to revoke licenses over Input already processed into Luma's AI models or aggregated datasets prior to deletion. The agreement separately states that Luma will cease using personal data for its own purposes upon deletion, subject to retention obligations required by law or the Privacy Policy.
How other platforms handle this
Under Section 1798.83, Ancestry currently does not share any Personal Information with third parties for their own direct marketing purposes.
if you are accessing and using Lime Services under a corporate account...you acknowledge and agree that Lime may share certain of your usage information with whomever provided you with access to the Lime Services
Chats are disconnected from your account before being sent to service providers.
"Note that deletion of your Account does not affect any licenses you have granted to Luma under this Agreement with respect to Input or Output that has already been incorporated into Luma's systems, models, or Aggregated Data prior to deletion.Excerpt from Luma AI's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision may create tension with GDPR Article 17's right to erasure, which in certain circumstances requires deletion of personal data used for AI training purposes, subject to exceptions for legitimate interests …
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
ConductAtlas detected a major restructuring of Meta’s privacy policy that removed detailed consumer rights disclosures and relocated them to separate documents.
Your genetic data may be transferred to a new owner as a business asset. Here is what the Terms of Service actually say and what you can do right now.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision establishes that the account deletion right does not function as a complete data rights mechanism where Input has already been used in model training or aggregated data. The operational scope of this carve-out depends on Luma's internal data pipeline timelines, which are not disclosed in the document.
Under this clause, users who delete their accounts retain no ability under this agreement to revoke licenses over Input already processed into Luma's AI models or aggregated datasets prior to deletion. The agreement separately states that Luma will cease using personal data for its own purposes upon deletion, subject to retention obligations required by law or the Privacy Policy.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 288 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Luma AI.