This analysis describes what LinkedIn's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
If Your Content is prohibited under the laws of any jurisdiction where our Services are available, we may remove it even if it is not illegal in your location.
Microsoft or the owners of the Digital Goods may, from time to time, remove Digital Goods from the Services without notice.
Microsoft reserves the right to restrict the export of data that may compromise the security of the services or Microsoft's intellectual property.
"we may remove or restrict access to content, features, services, or information, including if we believe that it's reasonably necessary to avoid harm to LinkedIn or others, violates the law...Excerpt from LinkedIn's User Agreement
Buried in Robinhood's customer agreement is broad authority to close your positions, suspend your account, and force arbitration. Here is what it actually says.
Stripe's terms authorize fund reserves, payout withholding, and account termination. Here is what the agreement states and what business owners should review.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “we may remove or restrict access to content, features, services, or information, including if we believe that it's reasonably necessary to avoid harm to LinkedIn or others, violates the law...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 263 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LinkedIn.