This analysis describes what Ledger's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause establishes a time-bound obligation on Ledger, giving users a defined window within which to expect a response to legitimate requests.
Interpretive note: The term 'legitimate' is not defined in the excerpt, leaving open which requests qualify and which may be excluded from the one-month commitment.
The reader can expect Ledger to respond to any legitimate request within one month of submission.
How other platforms handle this
you have the obligation to provide to us evidence of such consent or authorization...the consent or authorization of the holder of parental responsibility for the minor...
If you are submitting a rights request as an authorized agent, you are required to submit proof of your authorization to make the request, such as a valid power of attorney or proof that you have signed permission...
Databricks has funded a Vulnerability Response Program for monitoring emerging vulnerabilities before they're reported to us by our scanning vendors.
"We respond to all legitimate requests within one month.Excerpt from Ledger's Privacy Policy
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause establishes a time-bound obligation on Ledger, giving users a defined window within which to expect a response to legitimate requests.
The reader can expect Ledger to respond to any legitimate request within one month of submission.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ledger.