This analysis describes what Impact's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
In any litigation to enforce any part of this Agreement, all costs and fees, including attorney's fees, will be paid by the non-prevailing party.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either Party may seek injunctive relief in any court of appropriate jurisdiction with respect to any alleged breach of such Party's Intellectual Property Rights, breaches of Confidentiality...
The Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction over ZipRecruiter's compliance with the EU-U.S. DPF, the UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. DPF.
"A party that primarily prevails in an action brought under this Agreement is entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.Excerpt from Impact's Terms and Conditions
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “A party that primarily prevails in an action brought under this Agreement is entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Impact.