Groq · Groq Terms of Use

Class Action and Class Arbitration Waiver

High severity
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF

What it is

You cannot join other users to sue Groq as a group — every dispute must be handled individually, whether in arbitration or in the limited court exceptions.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This waiver means you cannot participate in or lead a class-action lawsuit against Groq over website-related issues, even if thousands of other users experience the same harm — each person must pursue their claim individually.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Opt Out of Arbitration
    Within 30 days
    To preserve class action rights, opt out of the arbitration agreement (which includes the class action waiver) by emailing legal@groq.com within 30 days of accepting these Terms with a written opt-out statement.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Class Action and Class Arbitration Waiver and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
Need full compliance memos? See Professional →

Why it matters (compliance & risk perspective)

Class action waivers prevent consumers from pooling resources to challenge corporate wrongdoing collectively, which makes it economically impractical to pursue small individual claims and effectively insulates companies from widespread accountability.

View original clause language
YOU AND GROQ AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, unless both you and Groq agree otherwise, the arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person's claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding.

Institutional analysis (Compliance & legal intelligence)

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Class action waivers in consumer contracts are analyzed under FAA preemption doctrine (AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)) and California's McGill v. Citibank (2017), which holds that waivers of public injunctive relief under California UCL (Bus. & Prof. Code §17200) and CLRA (Civil Code §1770) are not preempted by the FAA. The CFPB has historically challenged class action waivers in financial services; the FTC treats them as a factor in unfairness analysis under FTC Act Section 5.

🔒

Compliance intelligence locked

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Watcher $9.99/mo Professional $149/mo

Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    Class action waivers in consumer contracts fall within FTC Act Section 5 scrutiny for unfair or deceptive practices that restrict consumer legal rights.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    California and other state AGs actively enforce consumer protection laws against class action waivers that may be unconscionable under state law, particularly post-McGill in California.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
Groq Terms of Use
Entity
Groq
Document last updated
April 29, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 30, 2026
Last verified
April 30, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-004333
Document ID
CA-D-00493
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
SHA-256
d3242ad8b6cda975e0cde7cbfd2576a780c4b6f7939419b3c4f49c34585b42ec
Verified
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Change verified
How to Cite
ConductAtlas Policy Archive
Entity: Groq | Document: Groq Terms of Use | Record: CA-P-004333
Captured: 2026-04-30 08:47:45 UTC | SHA-256: d3242ad8b6cda975…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/groq/groq-terms-of-use/class-action-and-class-arbitration-waiver/
Accessed: May 2, 2026
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other provisions in this document