This analysis describes what Groq's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes a procedural requirement that limits the joinder of claims in arbitration and restricts the structural forms of dispute resolution available. The operational effect is to require resolution of user disputes on an individual basis rather than through aggregated proceedings.
Users are required to pursue claims against Groq only in individual capacity through binding arbitration, and are prohibited from participating in class action proceedings or consolidated arbitration with other users. The arbitrator lacks authority to consolidate claims or preside over class-type proceedings absent mutual consent.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION (SECTION 12.2) ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.
Monitoring
Groq has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"YOU AND GROQ AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, unless both you and Groq agree otherwise, the arbitrator may not consolidate more than one person's claims, and may not otherwise preside over any form of a representative or class proceeding.— Excerpt from Groq's Groq Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes a procedural requirement that limits the joinder of claims in arbitration and restricts the structural forms of dispute resolution available. The operational effect is to require resolution of user disputes on an individual basis rather than through aggregated proceedings.
Users are required to pursue claims against Groq only in individual capacity through binding arbitration, and are prohibited from participating in class action proceedings or consolidated arbitration with other users. The arbitrator lacks authority to consolidate claims or preside over class-type proceedings absent mutual consent.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Groq.