You cannot join other users to sue Groq as a group — every dispute must be handled individually, whether in arbitration or in the limited court exceptions.
This waiver means you cannot participate in or lead a class-action lawsuit against Groq over website-related issues, even if thousands of other users experience the same harm — each person must pursue their claim individually.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Class Action and Class Arbitration Waiver and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Class action waivers prevent consumers from pooling resources to challenge corporate wrongdoing collectively, which makes it economically impractical to pursue small individual claims and effectively insulates companies from widespread accountability.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Class action waivers in consumer contracts are analyzed under FAA preemption doctrine (AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011)) and California's McGill v. Citibank (2017), which holds that waivers of public injunctive relief under California UCL (Bus. & Prof. Code §17200) and CLRA (Civil Code §1770) are not preempted by the FAA. The CFPB has historically challenged class action waivers in financial services; the FTC treats them as a factor in unfairness analysis under FTC Act Section 5.
Compliance intelligence locked
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.