This analysis describes what Google Gemini's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes that consequential automated decisions affecting individual rights in high-risk domains require human supervision, creating a structural safeguard against unreviewed AI-driven outcomes in sensitive areas.
Interpretive note: The excerpt ends with an ellipsis, indicating the listed domains are non-exhaustive examples. The canonical claim names the stated examples; additional unlisted domains may also fall within scope.
Users are prohibited from deploying Google Gemini to make automated decisions that have a material detrimental impact on individual rights without human supervision in high-risk domains including employment, healthcare, finance, and legal.
How other platforms handle this
Request a review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data.
Mailchimp uses a combination of automated and human detection review processes to ensure that Members are complying with our Standard Terms of Use and this Acceptable Use Policy.
We may (but are not obligated to) use automated systems and human reviewers to record, monitor, analyse, modify, disable and, store and review use of our Interactive Features...
Monitoring
Google Gemini has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Makes automated decisions that have a material detrimental impact on individual rights without human supervision in high-risk domains -- for example, in employment, healthcare, finance, legal...— Excerpt from Google Gemini's Google Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes that consequential automated decisions affecting individual rights in high-risk domains require human supervision, creating a structural safeguard against unreviewed AI-driven outcomes in sensitive areas.
Users are prohibited from deploying Google Gemini to make automated decisions that have a material detrimental impact on individual rights without human supervision in high-risk domains including employment, healthcare, finance, and legal.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 215 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google Gemini.