This analysis describes what Google DeepMind's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The obligation is qualified by 'aim to' rather than an unconditional commitment, and is triggered only by Google DeepMind's own assessment that both 'unmitigated' and 'material' risk thresholds are met, which affects the reliability and scope of the disclosure commitment.
Interpretive note: The excerpt ends with an ellipsis, suggesting the full provision may include additional conditions, recipients, or qualifications not available for analysis. The phrase 'aim to' is a softer commitment than 'will' or 'shall' and has been preserved exactly.
Readers are informed that government disclosure is not automatic or unconditional—it is aspirational ('aim to') and depends on Google DeepMind's own assessment that a specific dual-threshold of unmitigated and material public safety risk has been reached.
How other platforms handle this
Consistent with applicable law, you understand and agree that Tinder may not share information with you regarding your account termination if doing so would potentially impair the safety or privacy of other users.
We will make it clear by notice to you which (if any) goods or services, or website links, we receive a benefit from by featuring them on our Platform.
In certain situations, Glassdoor may be required to disclose personal data in response to lawful requests by public authorities, including to meet national security or law enforcement requirements.
"if we assess that a model has reached a CCL that poses an unmitigated and material risk to overall public safety, we aim to share information with appropriate government authorities...Excerpt from Google DeepMind's Frontier Safety Framework
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The obligation is qualified by 'aim to' rather than an unconditional commitment, and is triggered only by Google DeepMind's own assessment that both 'unmitigated' and 'material' risk thresholds are met, which affects the reliability and scope of the disclosure commitment.
Readers are informed that government disclosure is not automatic or unconditional—it is aspirational ('aim to') and depends on Google DeepMind's own assessment that a specific dual-threshold of unmitigated and material public safety risk has been reached.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google DeepMind.