This analysis describes what GOAT's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Any access to or use of the Services or goods through your account by others, including your spouse, dependents, Recipients, and any access by AI Agents you enable or that operate on your behalf...
NVIDIA will have no obligation...to indemnify...with respect to any Indemnifiable Claim relating to...any use of the Enterprise Products in violation of applicable laws or regulations, or expressly prohibited by the Agreement or the Enterprise Product's documentation...
you agree to cooperate with Walmart if and as requested by Walmart in the defense and settlement of such matter.
"we remain responsible and liable under the DPF Principles if third-party agents that we engage to process the personal data on our behalf do so in a manner inconsistent with the DPF Principles, unless we prove that we are not responsible for the event giving rise to the damage.Excerpt from GOAT's Privacy Policy
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “we remain responsible and liable under the DPF Principles if third-party agents that we engage to process the personal data on our behalf do so in a manner inconsistent with the DPF Principles, unless we prove that we are not responsible for the event giving rise to the damage.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 229 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GOAT.