“Review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data that affect your interests, including decisions aimed at defining your personal, professional, consumption, and credit profile...”
This analysis describes what Glean's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This right applies specifically to decisions made solely by automated means, giving users a check on algorithmic determinations that define personal, professional, consumption, or credit profiles.
Interpretive note: The excerpt appears to be a noun phrase fragment rather than a complete sentence, suggesting it is drawn from a list of rights. The right is stated clearly enough to form a canonical claim, but the procedural mechanism for exercising it is not present in the excerpt.
You can request review of any decision Glean makes about you through solely automated processing, including those that define aspects of your personal, professional, consumption, or credit profile.
How other platforms handle this
You may contact Uber here with questions about Uber's use of your data for purposes of automated decision making, including regarding the factors considered... to request review of any such decisions by Uber personnel.
Such tools are used to support, and not replace, human review where required by law.
Mailchimp uses a combination of automated and human detection review processes to ensure that Members are complying with our Standard Terms of Use and this Acceptable Use Policy.
"Review of decisions made solely based on automated processing of personal data that affect your interests, including decisions aimed at defining your personal, professional, consumption, and credit profile...Excerpt from Glean's Privacy Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This right applies specifically to decisions made solely by automated means, giving users a check on algorithmic determinations that define personal, professional, consumption, or credit profiles.
You can request review of any decision Glean makes about you through solely automated processing, including those that define aspects of your personal, professional, consumption, or credit profile.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 210 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Glean.