The statement authorizes international transfers of Personal Information to the U.S. and other jurisdictions, relying on website use as a consent signal where applicable law permits this mechanism.
This analysis describes what Glean's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Reliance on implicit consent through website use as a transfer mechanism for international data flows may require evaluation under GDPR and LGPD, which impose specific requirements on consent validity and adequacy for cross-border transfers.
Interpretive note: The validity of implicit consent through website use as an international transfer mechanism varies by jurisdiction; GDPR Article 49 requirements for derogations may limit the enforceability of this approach for EEA users.
Under this clause, using Glean's websites is treated as consent to international data transfers where applicable law permits this mechanism; EEA and UK users should note that Standard Contractual Clauses and DPF certification are identified as the primary transfer mechanisms, with implicit consent as a secondary basis.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle International Data Transfers and Consent Mechanism and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"Glean is a global organization. Your Personal Information may be transferred to, and processed in, the United States or other jurisdictions where data protection laws may differ from those in your country of residence. By using our websites, where applicable law permits, you consent to such transfers.Excerpt from Glean's Privacy Policy
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision implicates GDPR Chapter V (international transfers), LGPD Chapter VIII (international data transfers), and equivalent frameworks.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Reliance on implicit consent through website use as a transfer mechanism for international data flows may require evaluation under GDPR and LGPD, which impose specific requirements on consent validity and adequacy for cross-border transfers.
Under this clause, using Glean's websites is treated as consent to international data transfers where applicable law permits this mechanism; EEA and UK users should note that Standard Contractual Clauses and DPF certification are identified as the primary transfer mechanisms, with implicit consent as a secondary basis.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Glean.