Provision record
GitHub · GitHub Acceptable Use Policies · View original document ↗

Malware, Exploits, and Attack Infrastructure Prohibition

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 282 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track GitHub and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The agreement prohibits uploading, hosting, or transmitting malicious code, and also prohibits using GitHub infrastructure as part of any system designed to deliver or amplify cyberattacks, including command-and-control infrastructure.

This analysis describes what GitHub's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision prohibits not only direct malware hosting but also the use of GitHub repositories or infrastructure as attack support systems, which has particular relevance for security researchers whose dual-use tools or proof-of-concept exploit code may be assessed under this restriction.

Interpretive note: The scope of 'part of a system designed to deliver or amplify cyberattacks' is not precisely defined in the master AUP and requires reference to the subsidiary active malware and exploits sub-policy for further interpretive guidance, particularly for dual-use security tools.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 20, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 4245 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, hosting malicious code or using GitHub infrastructure to support cyberattack delivery or command-and-control operations is prohibited, and such content or accounts are subject to removal or suspension. Security researchers should note that dual-use tools and proof-of-concept exploit code may require evaluation against this provision and GitHub's specific security research policy.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

You may not display any personal contact, banking, or peer-to-peer payment information, whether in relation to you or any other person (for example, names, home addresses or postcodes, telephone numbers, email addresses, URLs, credit/debit card...)

ActiveCampaign Medium

Bypass or ignore instructions contained in our robots.txt file that controls automated access to portions of our Services;

Mailchimp Medium

Send content created in Mailchimp through another service.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not upload, post, host, or transmit any content that: contains malicious code, or is part of a system designed to deliver or amplify cyberattacks, including by providing infrastructure for hosting malicious content or command-and-control for attacks.

Excerpt from GitHub's Acceptable Use Policies

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), which prohibits unauthorized access to computer systems and the distribution of code used to damage protected computers.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal
DMCA
United States Federal
DSA
European Union

Provision details

Document information
Document
GitHub Acceptable Use Policies
Entity
GitHub
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 20, 2026
Last verified
May 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012416
Document ID
CA-D-00790
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
4cb1cc8f63e15186f39023d0124a0552f90d900ee77625b9086bf67218c19c3e
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 21:06 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: GitHub
Document: GitHub Acceptable Use Policies
Record ID: CA-P-012416
Captured: 2026-05-20 21:06:09 UTC
SHA-256: 4cb1cc8f63e15186…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/github/github-acceptable-use-policies/provision/CA-P-012416/malware-exploits-and-attack-infrastructure-prohibition/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does GitHub's Malware, Exploits, and Attack Infrastructure Prohibition clause do?

This provision prohibits not only direct malware hosting but also the use of GitHub repositories or infrastructure as attack support systems, which has particular relevance for security researchers whose dual-use tools or proof-of-concept exploit code may be assessed under this restriction.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, hosting malicious code or using GitHub infrastructure to support cyberattack delivery or command-and-control operations is prohibited, and such content or accounts are subject to removal or suspension. Security researchers should note that dual-use tools and proof-of-concept exploit code may require evaluation against this provision and GitHub's specific security research policy.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 282 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with GitHub?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GitHub.